The guidelines regarding instances of blood seen on sport horses whereas competing within the Olympic disciplines have lengthy utilized – and been the topic of debate. The FEI states the foundations exist “to guard our horses, and there will be no gray areas relating to horse welfare”.
It’s vital to notice that not all instances of blood imply there’s a welfare challenge or {that a} rider has executed one thing fallacious. The FEI states “eliminations for blood-related causes don’t suggest that there was any intent to injure the horse” and that many incidents are “minor or unintended”. However the penalties are completely different throughout the disciplines.
In dressage guidelines, recent blood leads to elimination. If the decide at C suspects blood on a horse throughout a take a look at, they are going to be stopped and, if recent blood is confirmed, eradicated. If no recent blood is detected, they might proceed.
Contemporary blood within the horse’s mouth or space of spurs through the post-test tack examine leads to elimination, and blood discovered elsewhere on the physique will lead to an examination by a vet, who will advise on the horse’s health to proceed in additional competitors.
However there are completely different procedures in showjumping and eventing.
The showjumping guidelines state that blood (recent will not be stipulated) on the horse’s flanks leads to elimination. In instances of horses bleeding within the mouth, “resembling the place the horse seems to have bitten its tongue or lip”, officers could authorise the rinsing or wiping of the mouth, and permit the mix to proceed. However any additional proof of blood leads to elimination.
In eventing, the identical method is taken within the dressage part because the above dressage guidelines.
For cross-country, the foundations state “all athlete induced (spurs, bit and whip) blood have to be reviewed case by case”; if the horse exhibits recent blood, officers could authorise the rinsing or wiping of the mouth and horses could proceed if no additional bleeding. Instances of “vital blood” will lead to elimination.
Within the showjumping part, blood on the flanks or mouth lead to elimination – however the guidelines add that for “minor instances, resembling the place a horse seems to have bitten its tongue or lip” officers could wipe the mouth and permit them to proceed.
These variations have usually generated dialogue and questions.
H&H requested the FEI why the foundations differ, and was advised the disciplines have their very own particular person sport guidelines beneath the related technical committee, and “traditionally, this has led to every self-discipline codifying their very own guidelines on how instances of blood are dealt with”.
“The FEI believes that that is an applicable method given the numerous variations between the disciplines and is usually nicely accepted by stakeholders,” stated an FEI spokesperson.
“Blood is of course emotive”
Andrew Gardner was a judging supervisory panel member for the dressage on the Paris Olympics and a floor jury member of the Tokyo Olympics. He’s a former director of British Dressage and former member of the FEI dressage technical committee.
He advised H&H that the judges’ accountability is “very clear”.
“In dressage, if there’s recent blood on the horse, the decide at C has to use the rule – and that’s all there’s to it. Whether or not there’s loads of blood or a small quantity, the trigger is irrelevant to the motion that needs to be taken,” he stated, including that “horse welfare needs to be the paramount aspect”.
However Mr Gardner added that in his opinion these conditions can “typically lose context as a result of the end result is at all times elimination – however the trigger will not be assessed by a vet and the general public is left to attract its personal conclusion”.
“This may occasionally not at all times be truthful or correct,” he stated.
“The phrase ‘blood’ is of course emotive. It at all times wants evaluation, however what worries me is the chance of inference that with blood there’s a suggestion of a welfare breach, and that may be fallacious. We all know that blood will be brought on by unlucky, however however harmless issues, like a horse biting and catching its tongue or lip, a fly chew, or a graze. Whereas this at all times must be checked, elimination is usually a vital value to pay,” he stated.
“Nevertheless if a rider inflicts hurt, that may be very completely different and have to be handled, and all people would agree.”
Former worldwide rider Nick Burton was president of the eventing floor jury on the Tokyo Olympics, and officiates at five-star occasions. He advised H&H he can see why there are variations within the guidelines.
“In eventing we all know there’s extra threat as a result of horses are leaping and there’s the possibility for impression – however I can see the argument for the foundations being the identical,” he stated.
“It doesn’t matter what the self-discipline, at no level ought to or not it’s acceptable {that a} horse continues to compete whereas bleeding, there’s no determination to make.”
Mr Burton has officiated at high-profile occasions the place horses have been stopped for blood. In eventing cross-country, when the bottom jury stops a horse, it’s checked by a vet earlier than any determination is made on whether or not it could proceed.
“In a single case, the horse was checked and it had a really minor graze that cleaned, and the horse was restarted,” stated Mr Burton.
“I’ve additionally had a state of affairs the place a horse was checked and the bleeding continued, so the rider was eradicated. In these instances we now have an interview with the rider and so they obtain an FEI warning card, as a result of the FEI must find out about these items – and if that’s a recurring state of affairs then clearly one thing goes very fallacious.
“The bottom jury has loads of accountability, and welfare is the best precedence, however we’re additionally very conscious of the notion of what we’re doing with these animals – and whether or not that appears OK. If I went to a circus or zoo and noticed animals bleeding, I wouldn’t be completely happy to see that.”
The recording of blood offences
One other dialogue level is how blood instances are recorded. A yellow card or warning will not be at all times issued, and is predicated on the “particular circumstances of the case”.
The eventing guidelines state that for all “minor instances of blood induced by athlete within the mouth or associated to spurs, a recorded warning [which is different to a yellow card] will likely be issued” – and severe instances indicating abuse, will likely be handled beneath the abuse of horse guidelines.
The FEI warning playing cards database for eventing exhibits 29 warnings issued between 12 April 2019 and seven December 2024 for “minor” instances of blood – however these are additionally recorded as “abuse of horse”. When H&H questioned why they had been recorded as abuse when they’re “minor”, the FEI stated the reference to abuse for these instances was an “enter error and the warning record will likely be up to date accordingly”.
Within the showjumping official warning database one case seems; of “blood on the horse’s flanks” – and the separate warning playing cards record doesn’t particularly point out any instances of blood, nor does the dressage warning card record.
In showjumping and dressage, all offences are categorised beneath “abuse of horse”, “incorrect behaviour” and non-compliance with headgear and sport guidelines. Each the showjumping and dressage databases record abuse of horse instances, however these don’t specify any additional particulars, and it can’t be assumed blood was concerned.
Mr Burton stated that the place he has officiated and there have been blood-related stoppages, none have been abuse-related. However the blood offence on the FEI eventing warning card states “brought on by the athlete”, and doesn’t give an choice for an damage brought on by a graze on a fence, or a horse placing into itself, for instance.
“These conditions will be emotive, however as a floor jury we now have to take motion. I as soon as had a rider refuse to signal the cardboard as a result of they stated they didn’t trigger the blood, and so they most likely didn’t, however they nonetheless acquired the recorded warning,” he stated.
“It’s like a stain in your profession”
The Worldwide Leaping Riders Membership (IJRC) has been outspoken in regards to the guidelines in showjumping, which is able to bear a full revision in 2025. The elimination of Brazilian rider Pedro Veniss on the Paris Video games for a “micro case” of blood on Nimrod De Muze’s flanks – taking the Brazilian workforce out of the competitors – generated additional dialogue.
“Nobody needs to see a horse with blood on the edges, however the penalties of elimination are additionally dangerous for the picture of the game,” stated IJRC president François Mathy Jr.
“To be eradicated from the Olympics, the notion is it’s essential to have executed one thing actually dangerous; the general public will see this as mistreatment.
“Ours is an motion sport. If there’s a little scratch, not more than a chew from a fly, which is unintentional and requires no veterinary consideration, elimination is a big consequence and unfairly disproportionate.”
New Zealand showjumper Daniel Meech agrees with the IJRC that there needs to be different choices accessible to stewards, resembling issuing a warning, earlier than elimination.
Daniel was eradicated from the Tokyo Olympic particular person showjumping remaining when Cinca 3 was discovered to have what was deemed to be a spur mark, through the post-competition tack examine. Pictures confirmed that Cinca had no wound, rub or sore – and Daniel had by no means been eradicated for blood beforehand, or since.
“We do all the things for the security and welfare of our horses, making an attempt to make their lives as snug as potential – we don’t need these items to occur. The mark was so small, it was virtually a scratch. It wasn’t bleeding, it was an harmless, unfortunate accident,” Daniel advised H&H.
“In New Zealand we don’t have many showjumpers making the ultimate of an Olympics, and though I wasn’t within the operating for a medal, as an alternative of a end result, your file says eradicated. It suggests you’ve executed one thing intentional, and that’s there for the remainder of your life. It’s like a stain in your profession, and also you’re virtually made to really feel like a legal.
“We work our complete lives for these moments. You might have sponsors, house owners, after which the general public watching – there’s a giant scandal, individuals hear ‘spur mark’ and begin speculating.
“If somebody is being aggressive or mistreating their horse they need to be eradicated and handled. However when an unintended scratch disqualifies you from the largest occasion on the earth, it looks like there is likely to be higher methods to deal with these items”.
The Swedish method
Sweden’s nationwide blood guidelines are the identical throughout the disciplines and have been in place for round 10 years. Notably through the nation’s rule revision each two years, the general public has the chance to provide enter.
Underneath the Swedish federation’s guidelines, if blood is detected wherever on the horse throughout competitors, the rider should instantly cease and is eradicated. A decide assesses whether or not the blood has been brought on by the rider or not – and in that case, an extra penalty is issued.
Robert Solin of the federation’s sport division advised H&H Sweden’s guidelines work “very nicely” and that rider-induced blood instances are “very uncommon”. Throughout this 12 months’s FEI guidelines revision the federation proposed the same system by making the blood guidelines the identical throughout the disciplines – however this didn’t make it to the vote on the basic meeting. The FEI stated proposals to have a “one-size-fits-all” rule have “usually not acquired widespread help”.
Mr Solin acknowledged that in instances of blood not brought on by the rider, it’s difficult to cowl all cases in a rulebook.
“No laws are excellent, however they need to be nearly as good as potential. We’re depending on what society thinks and it’s actually a matter of the existence of horse sport or not – that’s what’s at stake,” he stated. “That’s why we would like the FEI to evaluate the foundations to make them equal, comprehensible and relevant – and officers and stakeholders have to know the foundations.
“Officers want to have the ability to say to the general public – and riders: ‘We made this determination for these causes,’ as a result of when choices are put beneath scrutiny it is extremely vital to have individuals that may clarify them.”
Mr Solin stated the FEI has made good progress on horse welfare and public notion, however highlighted the challenges the FEI faces.
“The FEI is a global organisation with greater than 130 member our bodies, and the best way we view horses will not be the identical all around the globe. It’s very tough to maneuver ahead typically, as a result of it needs to be a majority,” he stated. “The query is how do you get all these nations to come back collectively?”
Andrew Gardner believes the FEI and nationwide federations “are making a giant effort to deal with the present points for the good thing about the game and with the horse as the primary precedence”. However he questions whether or not in dressage blood instances ought to at all times be handled in the identical manner and result in rider elimination, or in instances on the Olympics, potential workforce elimination.
On the Paris Olympics, US dressage rider Marcus Orlob was eradicated when his journey Jane was discovered to have a “very minor reduce”, having knocked herself previous to getting into the sector, ensuing within the lack of the US workforce.
Mr Gardner requested if it “could be higher” if in these cases a vet examined the horse, and if deemed to be “100% nicely”, they’re allowed to proceed.
“That could possibly be a good manner all-round, and could possibly be within the curiosity of the game, with out ever prejudicing the perfect care and respect of the horse. Hopefully this could enable the general public to be assured in a course of that places the horse first however doesn’t unfairly infer criticism with out justification,” he stated.
A British Equestrian spokesperson advised H&H the present blood guidelines “largely do what’s required” bearing in mind the variations throughout disciplines.
“Guaranteeing consistency within the implementation and enforcement of these guidelines will be extra of a problem,” stated the spokesperson.
“Riders ought to have readability over how and when guidelines are carried out for a good and clear enjoying subject with equine and human welfare of utmost significance. Equally, we should guarantee there’s help in place for officers, in order that they have the boldness to make choices beneath excessive strain and act on a case-by-case foundation in the perfect pursuits of the horse.”
US Equestrian (USEF) believes there is a chance for a “diploma of cross-discipline harmonisation” of the foundations.
“With Marcus Orlob’s elimination it was disappointing as we couldn’t end as a workforce, however as we said through the Video games, we respect the foundations and perceive why the choice was made,” a USEF spokesperson advised H&H.
“And not using a drop rating, it does current challenges, and we’re open to having dialogue on this rule going ahead.”
Olympic dressage rider Laura Tomlinson believes there can’t be gray areas in guidelines.
“We must be in a spot the place final respect for the animal is proven, and that needs to be that we’re completely happy to sacrifice success in these moments,” she advised H&H.
However when elimination of a rider may end up in the elimination of a workforce, Laura questions whether or not there could possibly be a separate rule round blood on limbs brought on by minor knocks or grazes.
“It’s a tough one to sift aside and I can see why it’s cleaner to have a rule with no room for error. However when a horse can spook and nick itself for instance, and also you’ve spun a complete workforce, that appears brutal,” she stated.
Laura, who has by no means had a blood-related elimination, stated though she doesn’t particularly fear about the potential of an incident when driving, she thinks about public notion.
“Persons are determined to seize a foul picture or a bit second. In the intervening time I’m not on the very high within the sense that I’m not one of many few riders that everybody is watching, however I’ve been there earlier than and I do know what it’s prefer to really feel fully scrutinised,” she stated.
“Sport ought to by no means be prioritised over equine welfare”
Vet Hans-Christian Matthiesen, a five-star dressage decide and head of the Worldwide Dressage Officers Membership, believes the blood guidelines in dressage are “fairly clear” and for the surface world “simple to grasp” – however stated within the best world “we should always have the identical guidelines throughout the disciplines, and that is one thing we have to work on for the long run”.
Mr Matthiesen added that though there’s a distinction between blood from a rider-induced damage and a horse injuring itself, speaking that is difficult.
“It’s nonetheless the identical image; a horse with blood on it in competitors, and we don’t need that. That’s one thing we now have to be actually cautious about,” he stated.
“In some conditions the horse may knock himself, or hit the fence, and we form of settle for that within the horse world. However that’s tough to defend with any good arguments, as a result of though a horse may not be lame, even with a small scratch, they’re more likely to really feel ache.”
Discussing how we talk blood-related incidents to the general public, Nick Burton believes riders and house owners can play a task.
“I feel they need to take accountability by placing out an announcement and make a really clear message about their concern for his or her horse, and reassurance that their horse is OK. For me that might be fairly highly effective,” he stated.
World Horse Welfare chief government Roly Owers advised H&H the charity feels the blood guidelines are “applicable and dealing nicely”.
“After all, there’s room for enchancment, as it’s immensely tough to create guidelines overlaying each eventuality and won’t inadvertently penalise people who’ve simply suffered dangerous luck,” he stated.
“However the precept of the foundations – that we should always take a zero-tolerance method to permitting horses to compete after they have open wounds – is sound when it comes to defending equine welfare and the picture of the game.”
He added that having the identical guidelines for all disciplines would assist with understanding – from inside and out of doors the game..
“We acknowledge, nevertheless, that the magnitude of threat for a horse going cross-country may be very completely different from that of a horse doing a dressage take a look at – and any rule must be life like,” he stated.
H&H requested Mr Owers if blood-related situations can ever be deemed ‘OK’ or defended, for instance when a horse knocks itself.
“No damage that breaks the pores and skin and attracts blood will be described as ‘OK’ and these occurrences ought to by no means be accepted as a by-product of the game. All the pieces must be executed to keep away from damage to horses, irrespective of the way it happens,” he stated.
“I acknowledge there’ll at all times be ‘dangerous luck’ tales. However typically an damage that doesn’t seem like brought on by one thing the rider ‘did’ could occur due to the best way the horse is ridden or reacts to the state of affairs – and that is usually all the way down to the best way they’ve been ready and educated.”
Mr Owers concluded that a very powerful level is that the “actuality of the game ought to by no means be prioritised over equine welfare”.
● What are your ideas on the blood guidelines in horse sport? Write to us at hhletters@futurenet.com, together with your identify, nearest city and nation, for the possibility in your letter to seem in a forthcoming challenge of the journal
You might also be thinking about:
Credit score: Peter Nixon
Credit score: Peter Nixon
Credit score: Kevin Sparrow Images
Credit score: Emma Herrod Images
