Jan 30, 2024
Austin, we will do higher.
Final week, we shared a promise to assist our neighborhood higher perceive how Austin animal welfare is evolving as a result of it’s our responsibility to guard what’s humane and proper and advocate for progress.
With that promise in thoughts, I’m writing at the moment to supply some current updates a couple of decision that may have an effect on Austin animals. This decision is on the agenda for the February 1 metropolis council assembly. We now have been on prime of this since we first heard mutterings of it over the vacations and have been gratefully working hand in hand with the town supervisor to assist mitigate any unintended penalties.
This decision tackles 4 vital topics. You may learn extra right here. Just one was probably dangerous, if not amended, however we imagine the modification provided by the Mayor at at the moment’s work session is spot on. Right here’s a fast recap of the merchandise, what we’re conserving an in depth eye on and what it will probably imply for canines in Austin.
The decision seeks to alter the ordinance from the present regulation that permits the town to euthanize a canine with out giving discover to teams like APA! first:
-
From a canine that causes extreme damage requiring stitches to a canine that causes punctures as deep as half the canine tooth of a canine.
-
From requiring that the canine chew be unprovoked to incorporate all bites, provoked and unprovoked.
We need to be clear that we’re not categorically opposed to those adjustments. We strongly imagine that our neighborhood deserves security, and we all know that not all canines are secure for individuals and different animals to be round. We work exhausting to make sure security by way of our personal programming. And typically, we are going to humanely euthanize a canine that we can’t make secure.
It is a difficult topic for any metropolis to sort out. We all know that the Metropolis Council Members are in a troublesome place as a result of they need to present effort towards serving to the individuals who have been bitten by canines in our neighborhood.
Nevertheless, we need to make sure that the info getting used to find out whether or not or not a canine is secure is correct. Three elements give us sturdy motive to imagine that there’s work wanted to be carried out to make sure the town might be working with appropriate data.
-
Taking a look at final 12 months’s information provides uncertainty. If this code had been enacted final 12 months, the info we obtained figuring out canines who got here to us as a part of the No Kill partnership and would have been euthanized with out our capability to take them, contained canines that didn’t meet the Degree 4 standards. There was solely ONE chew documented as deep as half of a canine tooth, and one canine didn’t have any bites on file in any respect.
-
The information they’re utilizing to justify the necessity for this ordinance change will not be factually correct. About 18 months in the past, the town of Austin eliminated the class designated explicitly for lower-level bites, which implies many canines with any sort of conduct score are being included within the average or extreme scores, even when they don’t have chew histories at degree 4 and above on the Dunbar scale. We need to confirm that whole bites went up, not only a push of 1 class to the others.
-
The Metropolis of Austin’s Animal Providers underwent an Audit that lasted properly over a 12 months. The auditors said, “We discovered it (the AAC) typically has conflicting or inaccurate data, or no data in any respect.” This has not been rectified but.
We’re grateful that our considerations outlined above have been
heard and that an modification for the six-month extension has been made.
And we hope it passes on Thursday. If it have been as much as us, here’s what we
would advocate occur over these six months to actually perceive any
improve and mitigate it:
-
Get into the neighborhood:
Create a focused plan for the areas the place canines that chew reside and do an
training plan on neutering, applicable pet socialization and chew
consciousness. On the similar time, supply fencing help for house owners of canines
that repeatedly get unfastened and prioritize canine consumption into the shelter
from these areas. This would supply assets to areas in Austin that
are in want, create safer canines and restrict reactive punitive measures. -
Verification of knowledge
offered by metropolis employees at Council Work Session. It’s important that
any information offered, particularly 12 months to 12 months, is really apples to apples.
Bottomline: We help the idea of
utilizing a scientific strategy to eradicating canines which can be actually harmful
from our neighborhood. We simply need the town to make use of correct and thoroughly
examined information when making life-and-death choices.
We now have watched our metropolis animal companies wrestle to care
for our neighborhood, look after sheltered animals and preserve No Kill over the
final three years. We’re not trying to blame. We simply need ahead
momentum. If this had gone into impact with out the six-month pilot part
that the mayor requested for, we imagine that our metropolis would have taken
one other step backward.
The muse of No Kill is constructed on transparency,
accountability and treating each animal as a person, and we must always
attempt to take care of that.
Proper now, we don’t want emails or talking on the council assembly however please fill out this survey. We plan to share the info with council places of work to allow them to see higher what our neighborhood wants.
Thanks,
Dr. Ellen Jefferson
